HomeVisitMuseum ExhibitsFact SheetsDisplay

Countering MiGs: Air-to-Air Combat Over North Vietnam

Gun camera image of the MiG-17 victory by F-105 pilot Maj. Ralph Kuster Jr. on June 5, 1967. (U.S. Air Force photo)

Gun camera image of the MiG-17 victory by F-105 pilot Maj. Ralph Kuster Jr. on June 5, 1967. (U.S. Air Force photo)

Though used primarily as a bomber, the F-105 had some success against the MiGs -- its pilots shot down nearly 30 MiGs using the aircraft’s internal cannon. The firing port is in the upper left corner of the photo. (U.S. Air Force photo

Though used primarily as a bomber, the F-105 had some success against the MiGs -- its pilots shot down nearly 30 MiGs using the aircraft’s internal cannon. The firing port is in the upper left corner of the photo. (U.S. Air Force photo

F-4Cs and F-4Ds did not have an internal gun. Some were equipped with an external gun pod. Here, armorers load 20mm cannon rounds into an F-4 gun pod. In the upper right corner are several complete gun pods. (U.S. Air Force photo

F-4Cs and F-4Ds did not have an internal gun. Some were equipped with an external gun pod. Here, armorers load 20mm cannon rounds into an F-4 gun pod. In the upper right corner are several complete gun pods. (U.S. Air Force photo

F-4C of the 497th Tactical Fighter Squadron, 8th Tactical Fighter Wing, rolls out on takeoff. It is configured for the MiGCAP escort role with Sparrow air-to-air missiles under the fuselage, and Sidewinder air-to-air missiles and extra fuel tanks under the wings. (U.S. Air Force photo)

F-4C of the 497th Tactical Fighter Squadron, 8th Tactical Fighter Wing, rolls out on takeoff. It is configured for the MiGCAP escort role with Sparrow air-to-air missiles under the fuselage, and Sidewinder air-to-air missiles and extra fuel tanks under the wings. (U.S. Air Force photo)

Early F-4s in Southeast Asia were painted gray, but by 1966, they were camouflaged like the Phantom at the bottom of the photograph. (U.S. Air Force photo)

Early F-4s in Southeast Asia were painted gray, but by 1966, they were camouflaged like the Phantom at the bottom of the photograph. (U.S. Air Force photo)

The F-4E had many improvements over earlier F-4s -- most notably its internal 20mm gun. The first F-4Es arrived in Southeast Asia in late 1968. (U.S. Air Force photo)

The F-4E had many improvements over earlier F-4s -- most notably its internal 20mm gun. The first F-4Es arrived in Southeast Asia in late 1968. (U.S. Air Force photo)

North Vietnamese Air Force MiG-17 pilots walk by their aircraft. (U.S. Air Force photo)

North Vietnamese Air Force MiG-17 pilots walk by their aircraft. (U.S. Air Force photo)

The VPAF was equipped with a small number of the MiG-19 fighters. Pictured here are MiG-19 pilots discussing tactics on their flightline. (U.S. Air Force photo)

The VPAF was equipped with a small number of the MiG-19 fighters. Pictured here are MiG-19 pilots discussing tactics on their flightline. (U.S. Air Force photo)

VPAF MiG-21 deploying its braking chute while landing after a mission. (U.S. Air Force photo)

VPAF MiG-21 deploying its braking chute while landing after a mission. (U.S. Air Force photo)

The key mission for U.S. Air Force fighter escorts (or MiGCAPs) over North Vietnam was to prevent enemy MiG fighters from interfering with American strike aircraft. The MiG pilots' primary goal was to force strike aircrews to jettison their bombs early, thereby disrupting the bombing mission.

In 1965, the small North Vietnamese Air Force (also known as the Vietnam People's Air Force or VPAF) was equipped with somewhat outdated, gun-armed MiG-17s. The entry of missile-armed, supersonic MiG-21s in early 1966, however, dramatically increased the VPAF threat. The USAF's primary counter to the MiG was the F-4 Phantom II fighter.

Though outnumbered, VPAF MiGs had some significant advantages. Guided by ground controllers using early warning radar, MiG pilots only attacked under ideal circumstances, such as when USAF aircraft were bomb-laden, low on fuel, or damaged. The small, hard-to-see MiGs typically made one-pass attacks at high speed, then escaped to a sanctuary (either their airfields, which were not bombed until mid-1967, or to nearby communist China). Since they were always over friendly territory, MiG pilots could be back in action quickly if they survived being shot down.

USAF fighter pilots had better training and superior aircraft, but they endured several disadvantages. One serious issue was missile reliability and performance. Over one-half of the missiles fired by the USAF during the SEA War malfunctioned, and only about 1 in 11 fired scored a victory. The USAF rules of engagement dictated visual identification of an enemy aircraft before firing, which negated using the Sparrow missile at long range. USAF F-4s flown during ROLLING THUNDER did not have an internal gun to use when missiles failed. Although some F-4s carried external gun pods, it was not until the F-4E arrived in late 1968 that USAF Phantoms finally had an internal gun. Lastly, USAF pilots had to combat MiGs, SAMs and AAA over hostile North Vietnam, and if shot down, they were not always rescued.

Even so, enemy MiGs failed in their primary mission to stop US air attacks over North Vietnam during OPERATION ROLLING THUNDER. In fact, the VPAF fighter force sometimes retreated to China and stood down from combat operations due to heavy losses suffered at the hands of American fighter crews.

MiG pilots did little better in December 1972 -- by the end of OPERATION LINEBACKER II, USAF B-52s and tactical aircraft hit targets at will, forcing the North Vietnamese to sign a peace treaty. At the end of the Southeast Asia War in 1973, the VPAF had lost nearly 150 MiGs in combat to USAF fighter crews, while the USAF lost about 70 aircraft (of all types) to MiGs.

Click on the following links to learn more about air-to-air combat over North Vietnam.

OPERATION BOLO
USAF Southeast Asia War Aces
Tracking the MiGs: EC-121 Airborne Early Warning
Brig. Gen. Robin Olds: Combat Leader and Fighter Ace
River Rats

Click here to return to the North Vietnam: Rolling Thunder Overview.

 

Find Out More
Line
Related Fact Sheets
Boeing B-52D Stratofortress
McDonnell Douglas F-4C Phantom II
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21PF "Fishbed-D"
North Vietnam: Linebacker and Linebacker II
Line
Note: The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the National Museum of the USAF, the U.S. Air Force, or the Department of Defense, of the external website, or the information, products or services contained therein.

Featured Links

Plan Your Visit
E-newsletter Sign-up
Explore Museum Exhibits
Browse Photos
Visit Press Room
Become a Volunteer
Air Force Museum Foundation